Re:

Date: 2004-02-20 07:22 pm (UTC)
if you understood 20% of that talk, you were probably ahead of me. Normal modes of vibration and following along when she was doing taxonomic stuff on elementary particles was about as far as I got.

*grin* Well, maybe 20% was pushing it a bit. But I've read about most of the quantum mechanics stuff she talked about (quarks, gluons, antiparticles), not necessarily remembering specific relationships but getting the general idea, and I've been obsessed with dimensions for six years. I also read something Stephen Hawking wrote about the strong force, weak force, the EM force, and gravity all being related via the idea that they're all different aspects of one unifying force (presumably one in some fancy dimension that, because of cool Flatland stuff, you and I can talk about but not visualize). I don't remember who exactly came up with that idea, but it was in one of his books. I love that stuff! And I love Flatland. Dude, that book is pretty much the sole reason I stuck with math as long as I did.

I like your new icons.

Thanks! It just goes to show what you can do with some determination and a non-squeamish attitude toward putting word-processing programs to cruel and unnatural uses.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

timeripple: (Default)
timeripple

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9 101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 8th, 2026 09:13 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios